In this episode of the America's Work Force Union Podcast, Andrew Strom, a New York-based labor lawyer and OnLabor Blog contributor, joined us to discuss how judicial perspectives can impact labor law in America.
Strom discussed a recent case involving Moms for Liberty, where Trump-appointed judges ruled against prohibiting abusive language at public meetings. This decision highlights a broader issue of judicial inconsistency, especially when similar principles are applied to workplace disputes. Strom emphasized that judges often allow personal biases to influence their rulings, which can have significant implications for labor rights.
Strom then addressed the potential impact of an anti-worker National Labor Relations Board, particularly in light of recent political developments. He highlighted the challenges posed by judicial biases, urging labor advocates to remain vigilant and proactive in protecting worker rights. For those facing similar challenges, Strom advises leveraging legal advocacy and strategic litigation to counteract biased rulings.
Strom's insights into judicial biases offer valuable lessons for labor advocates, emphasizing the need for vigilance and strategic action. As labor faces an uncertain political landscape, he encouraged advocates to hold the judicial system accountable to fight for fair treatment for workers.
To hear more from Strom, listen to the full episode above.